But many governments fail to make use of NGO experience, choosing to see them as threats rather than potential allies.
International experience has shown that nongovernmental organizations are critical to the fight against HIV/AIDS. But in practice, and despite the public promises of many world leaders, AIDS NGOs often face obstacles on the ground. In Cambodia, a proposed new law risks making it harder for these groups to do their work. NGOs need regulation, but not regulations so burdensome as to entangle them in bureaucracy and drive them underground - as is threatening to happen in other parts of Asia.
Cambodia faces a serious AIDS
crisis. In 2003, the WHO estimated that there were 123,100 people living with
HIV/AIDS in the Kingdom, of whom fewer than 13,000 are currently receiving
treatment. Cambodia needs to urgently expand the impact of its efforts to
combat the epidemic.
Why are NGOs so important? The answer has to do with some of the factors that make AIDS different from other epidemics. The AIDS virus spreads most quickly among people who are marginalised from mainstream society: drug users, sex workers, men who have sex with men, and the urban and rural poor. To reach these people with life-saving HIV prevention information and treatment, we need organisations run by and for people from those communities. Because some of those most at risk of contracting HIV are engaged in activities that are illegal, and because of the intense and life-destroying stigma that surrounds the epidemic, these people are not likely to come and take part in government outreach programmes. Small, frontline AIDS and harm-reduction NGOs that have the trust of these communities are often the smartest, if not the only, way to reach them.
This year, expressing concerns about global terrorism, the Cambodian government
announced plans to pass a new NGO law. Prime Minister Hun Sen has called it one
of three priority pieces of legislation, along with a new penal code and an
anticorruption law. Unfortunately, the content of the law is unknown, and NGOs
have not been consulted in the process of drafting it. Based on proposals that
have circulated in the past, Cambodian NGO directors have expressed concerns
that the new law will create restrictions on NGOs like those in other parts of
Southeast Asia.
Until now, Cambodia has been one of the few countries in mainland Southeast
Asia to boast a vibrant, healthy NGO sector, with 2,200 NGOs and associations.
In Myanmar, Laos and China, where NGOs are heavily restricted, tighter
government control has slowed the response to AIDS.
In China,
where dozens of new grassroots NGOs have sprung up to work on HIV/AIDS in the
past 10 years, restrictive laws have made it impossible for most to register as
NGOs. Instead, they
register as commercial enterprises, which means they must pay taxes and exist
in a semi-legal shadowland. Chinese AIDS NGOs face close monitoring and
harassment by the authorities, which only makes it more difficult for them to
reach out to the public. AIDS activists Hu Jia and Wangdue are serving prison
sentences for their activism. Rural petitioners demanding compensation for
their infection with HIV through unsafe hospital blood transfusions are
arrested and put in secret "black jails". AIDS activists and doctors in China
estimate that millions of people are living with HIV as a result of the
country's slowed response to the epidemic.
In Vietnam, due to restrictive laws, only government-approved "mass
organisations" are permitted to register. Support groups of people living with
HIV/AIDS cannot register, and therefore they are not able to get international
funding. Drug users and sex workers cannot form NGOs at all, and therefore are
unable to mobilise to reach out to those at greatest risk of HIV infection.
In Myanmar, probably the most restrictive country in the mainland, NGOs cannot
register at all without the sponsorship of government agencies.
NGOs run without government approval cannot accept funds; their directors risk
arrest. Recently, the Myanmar government announced that it would require all
small, informal support groups of people living with HIV/AIDS to be supervised
by government work teams - a measure that will certainly limit their growth.
AIDS activist Than Naing is serving a life sentence for his activism. In part
as a result of all these restrictions, the rate of HIV infection in Myanmar has
skyrocketed.
In China, Vietnam and Myanmar, funds raised by NGOs may be channelled through
government agencies that find ways to keep a significant portion for themselves
- instead of passing it on to those who desperately need it. Censorship of Web
sites and publications has made it difficult to reach the public with basic
life-saving AIDS information.
Cambodia is home to a vibrant civil society sector and some leading AIDS and harm-reduction groups. NGOs in Cambodia that work on the ground can see up close the practices that are successful in combating AIDS and the policies that are unsuccessful. They have invaluable direct experience that can enrich policy and law. But many government officials have failed to see their own domestic NGOs as a resource to be consulted, instead seeing them as a potential threat. Cambodia can show leadership in Asia and reduce the spread of AIDS by fostering the growth of domestic civil society and by consulting Cambodian NGOs on the law that will govern them.
To see the original article, click here.
Sara Davis is the executive director of Asia Catalyst. A new report, "Restrictions on AIDS NGOs in Asia", is at www.asiacatalyst.org
Related links:
Does Cambodia Want Harm Reduction Groups to Cause Harm?
发表评论